<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bill's Content &#187; Jennifer Aniston</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com/category/jennifer-aniston/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com</link>
	<description>I don't think we're in Peoria any more ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:50:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>For are &#8216;Friends&#8217; for, if not for nipple slips?</title>
		<link>http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com/2007/02/13/for-are-friends-for-if-not-for-nipple-slips/</link>
		<comments>http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com/2007/02/13/for-are-friends-for-if-not-for-nipple-slips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courtney Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye candy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Aniston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nipple slip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com/2007/02/13/for-are-friends-for-if-not-for-nipple-slips/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve always suspected that one of the reasons we didn&#8217;t see the three actresses on &#8220;Friends&#8221; showing a lot of skin on film is that, while certainly lovely, they didn&#8217;t really have the kind of Playboy-perfect bodies that horny school boys want to see in R-rated fare. And besides, every single member of that cast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always suspected that one of the reasons we didn&#8217;t see the three actresses on &#8220;Friends&#8221; showing a lot of skin on film is that, while certainly lovely, they didn&#8217;t really have the kind of Playboy-perfect bodies that horny school boys want to see in R-rated fare. And besides, every single member of that cast made out like bandits in the paycheck department. None of &#8216;em needed to show skin to get parts when they were starting out, and none of really feel the need to bare all to renew public interest as their careers as Hollywood hotties wind down.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m surprised to see these <strong>[tag]Not Safe For Work[/tag]</strong> pics:</p>
<p>  <a href="/files/2007/02/jennifer-aniston-topless-the-breakup-01.jpg"><img width="86" height="83" src="/files/2007/02/jennifer-aniston-topless-the-breakup-01.jpg" alt="jennifer-aniston-topless-the-breakup-01.jpg" /></a><a href="/files/2007/02/cox-nipple.jpg">	<img width="114" height="85" src="/files/2007/02/cox-nipple.jpg" alt="cox-nipple.jpg" /> 	</a><a href="/files/2007/02/jennifer-aniston-topless-the-breakup-01.jpg"> 	</a></p>
<p><a href="/files/2007/02/cox-nipple.jpg">	 	</a><a href="/files/2007/02/jennifer-aniston-topless-the-breakup-01.jpg"> 	</a></p>
</p>
<p>In the first pic, [tag]Jennifer Aniston[/tag] walked around buck naked during these scene from her flick &#8220;The Break-Up.&#8221; The way it was supposed to work was that the cameras would capture her from the top of the chest up, and not capture her naughty bits. That&#8217;s not how it worked out when the DVD came out. Oops. </p>
<p>In the second pic, [tag]Courtney Cox[/tag] was having a swim with her offspring when the little darling decided to share with the world what he was getting at home.</p>
<p>In both [tag]nipple slip[/tag] cases, both actresses demonstrated that they have very nice, well-shaped and well-proportioned mamaries and their decisions to not flaunt them around intentionally was based on reasons other than any embarrassment over their shape and or size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com/2007/02/13/for-are-friends-for-if-not-for-nipple-slips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I wonder if Matt LeBlanc was the hand model for this</title>
		<link>http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com/2006/09/20/i-wonder-if-matt-leblanc-was-the-hand-model-for-this/</link>
		<comments>http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com/2006/09/20/i-wonder-if-matt-leblanc-was-the-hand-model-for-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Aniston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt LeBlanc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Vaughn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com/2006/09/20/i-wonder-if-matt-leblanc-was-the-hand-model-for-this/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Caption: A bra designed by actress Jennifer Aniston is shown at Sotheby&#8217;s auction house in New York, April 8, 2003.
I dunno. The hands look sorta puffy. Vince Vaughn, perhaps?
[tags]Matt LeBlank,Vince Vaughn,Jennifer Aniston,bra,boobs[/tags]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com/files/boob_hands.jpg" width="380" align="bottom" height="228" alt="" /></p>
<p><em><strong>Caption:</strong> A bra designed by actress Jennifer Aniston is shown at Sotheby&#8217;s auction house in New York, April 8, 2003.</em></p>
<p>I dunno. The hands look sorta puffy. Vince Vaughn, perhaps?</p>
<p>[tags]Matt LeBlank,Vince Vaughn,Jennifer Aniston,bra,boobs[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://billscontent.blogpeoria.com/2006/09/20/i-wonder-if-matt-leblanc-was-the-hand-model-for-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
